GOSPEL BOUND WITH COLLIN HANSEN
In This Week's Briefing

In this week’s briefing:

Why Gen Z doesn’t mind political violence, the essential idea of the 21st century, and why you shouldn’t read The Brothers Karamazov.

What I'm Seeing
Gen Z Isn’t Asking Why Bad Things Happen to Good People
Gen Z Isn’t Asking Why Bad Things Happen to Good People
Jared Dodson

The New Atheists’ influence peaked in the years 2006 and 2007 on the heels of three major tragedies: the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon; the 2004 earthquake and tsunami in the Indian Ocean; and the 2005 Hurricane Katrina that devastated the Gulf Coast and flooded New Orleans. Their younger Gen X and Millennial admirers, raised on self-esteem and expressive individualism, looked on this landscape and asked, “Why do bad things happen to good people?” They demanded to know how a supposedly good God could allow evil. Nearly 20 years this question remains common, and it’s why I wrote the short, accessible 2025 book Where Is God in a World with So Much Evil?.

Apologetics is a dynamic discipline, though, because while some questions remain perennial, others re-emerge seasonally. I’ve sensed that Gen Z doesn’t wrestle with the so-called problem of evil in the same way. In my book’s answer I hinted at this shift. Yes, many still want to know why God didn’t prevent 6 million Jews from dying in the Holocaust. But many others, especially in younger generations, fixate on why so many Nazis got away with it. They demand justice and don’t understand a God who won’t deliver it on their timeline and terms.

Jared Dodson, himself in Gen Z and teaching Gen Z undergraduates, sees the same dynamics playing out in his classroom at Bushnell University. When these students look at David and Bathsheba, they’re less concerned about her unjust suffering and more concerned with what they regard as God’s unjust forgiveness of David. Reading this account, I thought back to C. S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity where he corrects his earlier comment that chastity is the hardest part of Christianity for skeptics. It is, in fact, forgiveness that most angrily offends Christianity’s critics.

Why this recent change in perspective among Gen Z? I recently had lunch with a Gen Z member of my church. I asked why more Gen Z men have been engaging in religious questions, even attending church. He returned to COVID-19 as his generation’s coming-of-age moment. For many in his generation, 2020 was the first presidential election when they could vote. Suddenly serious about the world as they were robbed by the pandemic and subsequent shutdowns of school years, sports seasons, orientations, and graduations, they looked online for guidance. This is, after all, the first generation who grew up on social media. Forced even more online for school, they couldn’t avoid the cascade of bad news. From Ukraine to Gaza to Iran, they encountered the world as a violent, unjust place. They’ve watched at least three attempts on President Trump’s life. Ever since they entered school they’ve conducted regular rehearsals for school shootings. Many have come to expect violence as sometimes necessary to deal with opponents. Dodson writes:

This confluence of eroding trust, a sense of powerlessness, exposure to intense suffering of others, and desensitization to political violence leaves Gen Z looking for judgment—and justice. My students know all too well that bad things happen to good people. They want to know when bad people will get what they deserve.

Reacting to the digital display of violence, many in Gen Z started looking for answers in Christianity and the church. But not everyone liked the answers they got from older believers and even the Bible. I had to read Dodson a few times to understand his point—I just couldn’t believe it at first. Apparently, his students don’t flinch at the “ban” in Deuteronomy 20:16-17 (“you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall devote them to complete destruction”) or the severe, shared punishment against the tribe of Benjamin in Judges 20 after Levite’s concubine was raped in Judges 19.

It’s not that these same students nod along because they understand the holiness and justice of God. Or because they grasp the suffering of Christ as a propitiating sacrifice in Romans 3:25-26. It’s that they’re furious over a God who passes over some sins in forgiveness.

Earlier this week I recorded an interview with two Christian leaders in the UK. One of them mentioned an influx of young men at her church. She indicated some surprise and gratefulness. But then she noted that in conversation, she realized they don’t always attend for the right reasons, or even good ones. Sometimes they assume Christianity aligns with them against left-wing wokeness. They’re seeking just retribution against their cultural enemies.

Within Gen Z, we’re seeing twin forces on left and right that accept violence as necessary, even sometimes good—at least when it’s aimed at the other side. However it’s coded in our political dichotomy, this is another sign of Christianity’s decline in the West. For the sake of our society, and for Gen Z, we need the God who identified himself with every part of Exodus 34:6–7

The LORD passed before him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.”

Until we see ourselves as what’s primarily wrong with the world, and God’s forgiveness as our only hope, we can’t heal—together.

COLLIN HANSEN
Editor in Chief
 
What I'm Hearing
Ross Douthat, Keynote Address at the Ethics & Public Policy Center 50th Anniversary Gala
Ross Douthat, Keynote Address at the Ethics & Public Policy Center 50th Anniversary Gala

Ross Douthat is like the returning champion on Jeopardy! Someone is going to have to be even more insightful to displace him from this slot.

The Ethics & Public Policy Center has been one of my go-to Washington think tanks for as long as I can remember. Douthat delivered the keynote address at their 50th anniversary gala late last month. I don’t know anyone better than Douthat when it comes to balancing hopefulness in past accomplishments and concern with present and future threats. That combination served him well when looking back on 50 years for Judeo-Christian social conservatives in the public square. Survival alone amid the advance of secular humanism is achievement enough. But the defeat of Roe v. Wade and the reversal of transgender acceptance received special recognition from Douthat as well.

Maybe EPPC’s greatest success would be easy to overlook. But when you consider Heritage Foundation and a host of other Washington examples, Ryan Anderson and his EPPC staff and donors deserve Douthat’s kudos: “I think to have come through the last 10 years in particular with both your original commitments and your principles fully intact is a very important achievement that we should all be grateful for.”

Douthat concluded with a brief threat assessment. We’ve already covered the twin terrors to democratic governance: the woke left and the post-liberal right. But you’ll recognize his third and final threat to Judeo-Christian social conservatives from Carl Trueman’s Gospelbound interview: the transhumanist center, which appeals to the left in its progressive utopianism and the right in its anti-woke materialism. Our Silicon Valley overlords—according to Douthat, “Prometheian, if we’re being optimistic, or sometimes even Luciferian, if we’re being extremely pessimistic”—don’t fit our current political division. One day Elon Musk, the richest man in history, bemoans our fertility crisis and denounces President Trump. The next day he identifies the role of humanity as training our evolutionary AI superiors to replace us and catches a ride to China on Air Force One with President Trump. (For more on “silicon spiritualities,” stay tuned for my forthcoming Gospelbound interview with Christopher Watkin.)

According to Douthat, the essential 21st century idea is that “there is no cause greater than ensuring in this strange digital, technological, political future, the full flourishing, the ultimate survival, and the final triumph of—God bless us all—the human race.”

And that’s why we need to keep listening to Douthat, why he remains the returning Jeopardy! champion of this newsletter.

 
What I'm Reading
The Brothers Karamazov
The Brothers Karamazov
Fyodor Dostoevsky

Gary Saul Morson changed my life when I was an undergraduate European history major. His dramatic readings from Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, and especially his moral applications of their works for history and today, charted the course of my entire career. Earlier this year I had the honor of sharing that I would dedicate my book Churchill and Lewis: For the Salvation of the World to him. It’s only appropriate, because I first learned just about the entire moral and philosophical framework of the book from him.

Thanks to Professor Morson, Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov pops up in almost everything I write. The 19th-century Russian writer gave me the apologetic foundations for my aforementioned book Where Is God in a World with So Much Evil?. Starting with Brothers and Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina, I could branch out into War and Peace (what Lewis considered the best novel of all time, and an important source for my current book) and Dostoesvky’s Crime and Punishment, a perennial warning for anyone who considers himself above the law. Morson’s writing on “The Terrorist Mind” recently for The Free Press emerges from his decades of teaching Russian literature. If you read Morson, you’ll understand my previously stated concerns about political violence and Gen Z.

Occasionally a friend will sheepishly confess that he or she has tried and failed to read The Brothers Karamazov. I think they’re looking for my encouragement, to tell them to persevere, that the payoff will be worth it. They do the same with Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy. But while I encourage my fellow readers to stick with Wolf Hall, I usually give them permission to tap out on The Brothers Karamazov.

Why?

I jumped straight from a rural public school in South Dakota into history reading at Northwestern. That was hard enough, and I’ve always been fascinated with history. Russian literature would have been a few bridges too far for me—if not for Morson. I simply couldn’t have understood the significance of these books apart from his guidance. I probably couldn’t have even followed the plot, given all the confusion with Russian names.

So if you’re going to read The Brothers Karamazov, grab a good teacher. Yes, our digital riches make it easier than ever before to find that help. But it’s ok if you decide to devote your reading time elsewhere, and you glean insights for your personal life and public theology from those expert teachers.

I’ll be more than glad to recommend other works! Just keep checking back in this space.

 

Next week on Unseen Things:

Why I’m not elite, how Allen Guelzo plans to save Western Civ, and when revival comes.

 
Desktop mobile image alt text