TGC-icon-TKC-email-light

June 18, 2026

When I was growing up, the most familiar words of Jesus that everyone—Christian and non-Christian—knew was John 3:16: “For God so loved the world.” But in my ministry today, the most well-known words of Jesus are Matthew 7:1: “Judge not.” These words are often used to justify our moral choices and shut down conversation.

But is that what Jesus actually meant?

In her latest article for The Keller Center, fellow Rachel Gilson examines the context of Matthew 7 and guides us on how to respond to this common misreading. Rather than banning judgment altogether, Jesus calls his followers to deeper self-examination and honest, humble clarity about right and wrong. Rightly understood, this passage sets us free—not from accountability, but from hypocrisy.

If you’re wondering how to engage with other objections to Christianity, check out TGC’s Hard Questions series. In our latest installment, Jen Oshman tackles the question, “Why is it so hard to be happy?” When you buy all eight booklets in the series, you’ll save 45 percent (as long as you purchase by June 30).

MATT LIETZEN
Content Strategist
banner

“Jesus himself says not to judge.” Thus many a conversation about Christian ethics has come to a swift end. I often hear this verse quoted to me in conversations about the Bible’s sexual ethic, especially when these conversations occur in progressive, secular spaces. But it doesn’t take much imagination to guess how it might be deployed elsewhere. When used to shut down conversations, the implicit meaning is something like this: Jesus says it’s wrong to tell me I’m wrong.

Why does it work? For starters, Jesus really did make such a statement: “Judge not, that you not be judged” (Matt. 7:1). Not only did he say it, but it’s recorded in his most famous teaching, the Sermon on the Mount. This is why so many people know it (or some version of it). “Judge not” feels like it’s in the same league as the Golden Rule. So if a non-Christian or a Christian of a different opinion wants to suggest that her stance shouldn’t be opposed, the statement’s pedigree is top-tier.

In the second place, “judge” does carry a meaning of moral discrimination. So it’s not outlandish to think the sentence might be a prohibition on making moral judgments. It’s at least plausible enough that when presented in the heat of a conversation, those who take Jesus and the Bible seriously pause.

On the one hand, the source and the interpretation seem to suggest that whatever moral issue we’re talking about, the only safe landing spot is “agree to disagree.” On the other hand, when we’re in these situations, we retain a nagging feeling that this can’t be what Jesus means. How can we find our way out of the dilemma? By remembering how words work, how context works, and how love works.

READ MORE ABOUT MATTHEW 7

banner
TGC-icon-TKC-email-light
Wish you had a roundup of the best content from TGC?
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
SIGN ME UP