×
 

The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion

Written by Peter Harrison, edReviewed By Hans Madueme

The discipline of “science and religion” is a burgeoning academic field; it is also somewhat intimidating to outsiders since many of its experts have terminal degrees in both theology and science. Peter Harrison has enlisted a first-rate group of scholars to offer a competent introduction to the field in this Cambridge Companion volume. (Harrison has contributed some very significant monographs in the scholarly debate, e.g., The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science [1998] and The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Modern Science [2007].) The book is divided into three sections: Part I deals with historical prolegomena; Part II tackles examples of how science and religion relate; and the final section engages philosophical issues. There are chapters by noteworthy scholars like John Hedley Brooke, Ronald Numbers, Michael Ruse, Nancey Murphy, David C. Lindberg, Mikael Stenmark, and several others. To be sure, most readers of this journal will find something to disagree with here. Nonetheless, this volume serves as a rich appetizer to a controversial field, introducing hungry readers to the key players, the central debates and theories, and the historical and conceptual questions surrounding the fascinating encounter between science and religion.


Hans Madueme

Hans Madueme is associate professor of theological studies at Covenant College in Lookout Mountain, Georgia.

Other Articles in this Issue

The gist of this new book by Peter Enns is that evangelicals should revise their expectations of Genesis and Paul—with reference to Adam and the fall—in order to relieve perceived tensions between Christianity and evolution. This thesis turns out to be controversial...

In June 2011, the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) passed an overture entitled, “A Call to Faithful Witness.” This overture, while sounding alarms on biblical translations that render the familial terms for God (Son, Father) with less offensive terms in the target language...

I was very grateful to David for sending me a copy of his essay before publication. It displayed great grace and charity in a discussion which can sometimes generate more heat than light. I have genuinely enjoyed reading his essay, and it has prompted me…

Is it stating the obvious to say that a children’s bible is not a Bible? Perhaps. After all, a moment’s reflection reveals they are not the whole Bible and nothing but the Bible. They omit entire genres and books, and they add a great deal,…

Martin Salter has recently argued that Reformed paedobaptists are mistaken in citing Col 2:11–12 ‘as evidence that baptism replaces circumcision as the covenant sign signifying the same realities. His essay is a model of exegetical care, and he approaches the contentious issue of the application…