Read through the complete passage for this study, 2 Thessalonians 2:1–17. Then review the following questions on this section of 2 Thessalonians and record your notes and reflections. (For further background, see the ESV Study Bible, pages 2317–2318, available online at www.esvbible.org.)
The Man and the Mystery (2 Thess. 2:1–12)
Read Matthew 24 and identify several ways in which Paul’s words here echo Jesus’ own words there.
Some in Thessalonica had grown concerned that the day of the Lord had already come and that they had missed out. Such a fear may strike us as bizarre, but consider the nature of fear. How is it sometimes irrational? How is it sometimes contagious?
In 2 Thessalonians 2:1–12, Paul responds to the fear that the day of the Lord had come too quickly and that living Christians had missed out. How in his previous letter had he responded to the opposite fear—that the day of the Lord was not coming quickly enough and that deceased Christians had missed out?
Second Thessalonians 2:5, though easy to skim past, is profoundly important. In the process of refuting a false rumor, Paul appeals to his own authoritative teaching, which the congregation knew and had either forgotten or dismissed. Given that apostolic teaching is now permanently preserved for us in the New Testament, what might be a contemporary application of 2 Thessalonians 2:5 (see also 2 Thess. 2:15)?
Which verse in this passage indicates that it is wrong to conclude that the “man of lawlessness” is Satan himself?
The promise that Jesus will kill the lawless one “with the breath of his mouth” is an allusion to Isaiah 11:4. He will destroy with his voice—that is, in accordance with his word (see Rev. 19:15). How else does the New Testament apply this messianic passage (Isa. 11:1–5) to Jesus? (See, for example, Romans 15:12; Revelation 5:5; and Revelation 22:16.)
Do you think the man of lawlessness is the same figure as “the antichrist” described by John (see 1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 7)? Why or why not?
Second Thessalonians 2:10 speaks of those who “refused to love the truth and so be saved.” Salvation, then, is impossible apart from (1) the truth and (2) love for the truth. What is the significance of the word “love” here? Why do you think Paul chose it instead of, say, “know” or “affirm”? Lastly, how does 2 Thessalonians 2:10 shed light on what it means to “believe the truth” (2 Thess. 2:12)?
As we put 2 Thessalonians 2:10 and 2 Thessalonians 2:12 together, a vital truth begins to emerge: Behind an unconvinced mind lies a hard heart. People ultimately reject the gospel for moral, not intellectual, reasons. How do the following verses confirm this biblical picture: Psalm 119:100–104; Mark 6:52; 8:17; John 3:18–19; Romans 1:18; Ephesians 4:17–18?
In contrast to those who are “perishing” (2 Thess. 2:10) and “condemned” (2 Thess. 2:12), Paul tells the Thessalonians that God “chose” them to be saved (2 Thess. 2:13). Spend a few minutes pondering Deuteronomy 7:7–8 and Ephesians 1:4–5. Contrary to common assumption, how is the doctrine of election—which Paul introduced to the church at the outset of his first letter (1 Thess. 1:4–5)—a love doctrine?
Stand Firm and Hold Tight (2 Thess. 2:13–17)
Paul’s words of thanksgiving in 2 Thessalonians 2:13–14 are not the stuff of shallow religious jargon. Which persons of the Trinity does he mention, and what roles are they fulfilling? Also, where in these verses do you see the moment of justification? The process of sanctification? The promise of glorification?
God offers us comfort that is “eternal” and hope that is “good” (2 Thess. 2:16). What does this imply about the type of comfort and hope that the world offers? How have you experienced this contrast in your own life?
Read through the following three sections on Gospel Glimpses, Whole-Bible Connections, and Theological Soundings. Then take time to consider the Personal Implications these sections may have for you.